Vrouwen ontmoeten wallis groningenGratis erotische filmpjes met veel sex Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (npov which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. Npov is a fundamental principle. Wikipedia and of other Wikimedia is also one. Wikipedia : Neutral point of view, wikipedia Wikipedia 's three core). Npov is a fundamental principle. Wat een super geil verhaal.
Pornofilms gratis sex aangeboden
Achieving neutrality See the npov tutorial and npov examples. Fringe theories dating site top 10 sittard geleen and pseudoscience Further information: Wikipedia:Fringe theories and Due and undue weight Pseudoscientific theories are presented by proponents as science, but characteristically fail to gratis sex filmjes online pornofilms adhere to scientific standards and methods. This policy is non-negotiable, and the principles upon which it is based cannot be superseded by other policies or guidelines, nor by editor consensus. Giving "equal validity" can dating site top 10 sittard geleen create a false balance See: False balance "When considering 'due impartiality'. Generally, the views of tiny minorities should not be included at all, except perhaps in a "see also" to an article about those specific views. Not answered here I have some other objectionwhere should I complain? If you need help finding high-quality sources, ask other editors on the talk page of the article you are working on, or ask at the reference desk. Balance Neutrality assigns weight to viewpoints in proportion to their prominence. Rather, they should be attributed in the text to particular sources, or where justified, described as widespread views, etc. For example, the article on the Earth does not directly mention modern support for the flat Earth concept, the view of a distinct (and minuscule) minority; to do so would give undue weight. Their point of view can be mentioned if it can be documented by relevant, reliable sources, yet note that there is no contradiction. Most of them rely on stating as fact many statements that are demonstrably false. See Wikipedia's established pseudoscience guidelines to help with deciding whether a topic is appropriately classified as pseudoscience. Details about particular terms can be found at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Once it has been presented and discussed in reliable sources, it may be appropriately included. 2 Due and undue weight Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources.
Matched with my 18 year old step sister online. Cum in mouth.
Massage prive ontvangst gratis chatsites
All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view nPOV which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. Thus, when talking about pseudoscientific topics, we should not describe these two opposing viewpoints as being equal to each other. Conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, speculative history, or plausible but currently unaccepted theories should not be legitimized through comparison to accepted academic scholarship. For example, Evolution as fact and theory is a sub-article of Evolution, and Creation-evolution controversy is a sub-article of Creationism. The original npov policy statement on Wikipedia was added by Sanger on December 26, 2001. Keep in mind that, in determining proper weight, we consider a viewpoint's prevalence in reliable sources, not its prevalence among Wikipedia editors or the general public. Commonly cited examples include articles that read too much like a debate, and content structured like a resume. Some article titles are descriptive, rather than being a name.